Some Observations on Coax Loops


by Kelvin Brayshaw

About five years ago, because of age, and a growing reluctance to risk my neck walking on the roof, climbing trees, and in various other activities necessary for maintaining outdoor antennas, I decided to downsize my SWL set-up to a wholly
indoor operation, hopefully without losing too much signal quality.

With a move into elder-care always a last-resort possibility, I thought it wise to have my much-loved hobby future-proofed for such an eventuality.

As a start I tried a variety of frame loops described some years ago in a NZ DX Times article by Tony King of Greytown. These worked well and a small example of this type was handy for packing in the luggage with a portable receiver for use on holidays.

However, for the home situation I eventually settled on loops made from coaxial
cable which, although covering a smaller frequency range for a given physical size, appeared to offer better sensitivity and pretty effective nulling of local interference.

I used the “cut-and-try” method of construction, until finding some definitive advice on page 39-1 of the ARRL Handbook (1988), from which I learned that a length of less than 0.08 wavelength was the ideal size for the conductor in a single-turn loop. For approximately the next 1 MHz tuned beyond that critical point natural resonance appears to take over, and tends to overload a small receiver.

The loop on which the following figures are based is housed in a 70cm diameter hula hoop bought from the Warehouse about 3 years ago (unfortunately the latest stock available locally is of solid plastic – so I’ve turned to garden irrigation tubing to support loops of 70 cm or smaller, and 20mm PVC electrical conduit for larger square loops covering the lower 6MHz of the spectrum.

Length of conductor being Diameter X pi (3.14), the 70cm hula hoop takes close to 2.2M of coax. “Critical” Frequency = 300 divided by 2.2 x 0.08 = 10.9 MHz

I’ve read somewhere that 75-ohm coax should be used for the antenna itself, and 50 ohm for the feeder. However, the table below shows tuning range obtained, using various settings of the two mini variable capacitors in series with the loop, comparing both 50 and 75 ohm varieties for the antenna portion.

IMG_0264 (2)

Note that optimum sensitivity is in the top half of the range in all cases, so I find it better to use larger loops and old-fashioned 3-gang capacitors for tuning 49m and below.

Changes in sensitivity were more clearly defined by my Sangean ATS 505 receiver, which was used for these tests. My Eton E5 reacts in a slightly different way (possibly due to later front-end technology), but gives good results in everyday use, especially with an AR2 amplifier connected in the line from the antenna.

Frequency Range of 70cm Diameter Coax Loop using Two Mini-Variable Capacitors, as shown, in Series with Antenna




Enhanced by Zemanta

2 responses to “Some Observations on Coax Loops

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *